Popularising & Depopularising Political Issues in Turkish Social Media
20. – 21. November 2025
AH-A 217/18
(Herrengarten)
Organisation:
Dr. Duygu Karatas
We kindly ask you to register using the following form: Registration
In today’s multi-media ecosystem, political actors and groups have used platforms such as Twitter to present themselves as the “voice of the people,” fostering desired political opinions and social interactions, and problematising them as legitimate or illegitimate. Social media affordances allow opinions to be expressed and rendered quantifiable, comparable, and accountable through counters and rankings. However, these same affordances are also mobilised to fabricate sociality, popularity, and representation—through coordinated or self-organised practices involving automation, bots, and trolls.
It is undeniable that social media offer affordances to express opinions and render them quantifiable, comparable, and accountable through counters and rankings. On the other hand, these affordances are also extended to fabricate sociality, popularity, and representation through coordinated or self-organised fabricating practices, using automation, bots, and trolls. In the global context that “popularity—measured through likes, retweets, and reactions—becomes the sole currency of political legitimacy” (Werber 2025, p. II), we problematise claims to popularity and representation. Recent developments in AI-generated content and AI techniques—such as large language models, chatbots, and synthetic media—have further expanded these possibilities, enabling new ways of fabricating visibility, narratives, and engagement. These tools not only accelerate the spread of political narratives but also reshape how international audiences encounter and interact with political issues originating in non-Western contexts. By leveraging cross-platform social media data, the workshop will also explore how such content circulates beyond national boundaries and how international publics interpret, adapt, or contest these narratives.
Focusing on Turkey as a non-Western setting, the workshop will discuss investigate popularising and depopularising practices in relation to the current specific social and political developments, conceptualising them as a social dimension of fabrication. While the desired people, issues, and opinions are deliberately popularised through these diverse popularising practices, undesirable dissident people, issues, and opinions are depopularised through both technological and legal means, such as court proceedings, arrests, blocking accounts, and the shutdown of some platforms. The workshop will be based on case studies on current political issues (from the arrest of the prominent journalist Fatih Fatih Altaylı to the corruption operation to Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, the presidential candidate of the opposition party CHP). It will try to explore and compare different fabrication practices and instruments, the roles of different actors from political parties to platforms, and their effects on the public and democracy.
Throughout the workshop, a balance is maintained between scholarly analysis and practical insight. By combining keynote theories, case studies, global comparisons, and hands-on media exercises, the agenda ensures that participants not only discuss how political issues are popularised or depopularised in Turkish social media but also actively engage with the socio-technical tools and global frames that shape these processes. This holistic design – rooted in sub-project C01’s themes of representation, AI, and popular engagement and collabored with Working Group “Global Dimension of the Popular” – creates an enriching experience with tangible scholarly outputs.
Objectives
- Examine popularisation and depopularisation as fabrication in Turkish political social media, focusing on how people, opinions, and issues gain or lose visibility.
- Analyse fabrication tactics—bots, trolling, coordinated campaigns, deepfakes, AI-generated content, and algorithmic curation—as tools for shaping “the popular.”
- Situate social media within a wider media ecology, tracing its interplay with political and cultural currents in Türkiye.
- Compare Turkish cases with global practices to highlight shared patterns and local specificities, fostering cross-context discussion.
Please see the detailed program below. The workshop language will be English. In the analysis of Turkish content, the translations will be provided, and the organisers will support the participants.

Programm
12:30 – 13:00
Registration & Welcome Coffee
13:00 – 13:15
Opening & Welcome Remarks
13:15 – 13:30
Lightning Introductions
13:30 – 14:45
Keynote
Berk Esen
(Istanbul)
Media and Politics in Contemporary Turkey: Authoritarianism in the Digital Age – Depopularising, Populism, and the İmamoğlu Case
14:45 – 15:00
Coffee Break
15:00 – 16:00
Sarphan Uzunoglu
(Izmir)
Everyone Becomes a Troll: How Label Inflation Obscures Organized Influence Campaigns in Turkey
16:00 – 17:30
Discussion & Interactive Lab: Populism and Global Dimensions of (De)Popularisation
10:00 – 10:30
Day 1 Recap & Plan for the Day
10:30 – 11:30
Koray Kaplica
(Doğruluk Payı)
Fabricated Publics: How Fact-Checking Confronts Political Conspiracy and the Making of “the People”
11:30 – 11:45
Coffee Break
11:45 – 12:30
Activities / Interactive Discussion
12:30 – 14:00
Lunch
14:00 – 15:00
Banu Tuna
(Journalists’ Union of Turkey)
The Shutdown of Small News Outlets and the Role of Algorithms in the Survival of Opposition Digital Media in Turkey
15:00 – 15:30
Coffee Break
15:30 – 16:30
Activities / Discussion
16:30 – 17:00
Closing & Next Steps
Abstracts
Media and Politics in Contemporary Turkey: Authoritarianism in the Digital Age – Depopularising, Populism, and the İmamoğlu Case
Since its rise to power in 2002, Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) has systematically eroded democratic institutions and consolidated control over the judiciary, media, and bureaucracy, tilting the political playing field against the opposition. The 2017 constitutional referendum formalized this process by replacing the parliamentary system with a hyper-presidential regime, weakening horizontal accountability and concentrating power in President Erdoğan’s hands. The recent arrest of İmamoğlu marks a clear move toward hegemonic authoritarianism as seen in Venezuela, Belarus, and Russia, where elections no longer offer a chance for change. Taking stock of these developments, this talk examines how the media landscape has been restructured under AKP rule. Once an important power-broker in Turkish politics, the mainstream media has been absorbed into a dense network of pro-government outlets that amplify official narratives and marginalize dissenting voices. Consequently, Turkey’s media sphere has become sharply polarized between government-aligned and pro-opposition venues, with the latter facing severe legal and financial pressures. While digital venues were initially seen as pluralistic, the government’s efforts to regulate and prosecute online content reveal how authoritarian regimes adapt to the digital age by popularizing and depopularizing political issues in a partisan way.
Everyone Becomes a Troll: How Label Inflation Obscures Organized Influence Campaigns in Turkey
Prof. Uzunoglu will discuss how Turkish political journalism frequently conflates the concepts of trolling and astroturfing, two distinct forms of digital manipulation that carry very different democratic implications. Drawing on a content analysis of 200 news and opinion articles published between 2023 and 2025, the study reveals a pervasive pattern of “label inflation,” where the term “troll” is used indiscriminately to describe everything from individual harassment to highly coordinated propaganda campaigns. This lack of conceptual precision obscures the role of organized sponsorship and financial backing, leaving audiences unable to distinguish between spontaneous online provocation and covert influence operations designed to simulate grassroots support. While media coverage overwhelmingly condemns these practices as harmful to democracy, it rarely offers concrete solutions or policy recommendations, instead stopping at moral outrage. Journalism must adopt a clearer vocabulary and more rigorous investigative standards—such as uncovering sponsorship structures and recognizing hybrid influence campaigns—if it is to strengthen democratic accountability and resilience in the face of increasingly sophisticated digital manipulation.
Fabricated Publics: How Fact-Checking Confronts Political Conspiracy and the Making of “the People”
In Türkiye’s digital politics, misinformation and conspiracy theories do more than distort facts—they fabricate publics. Drawing on over a decade of fact-checking experience at Doğruluk Payı, this talk examines the recurring narratives that have shaped how truth, trust, and belonging are negotiated online. By tracing the trajectory of political misinformation in Türkiye over the past decade—culminating in a period marked by accelerating democratic backsliding—it highlights how disinformation operates as a social and political technology that both reflects and reinforces the changing dynamics of power and legitimacy.