Workshop

20. – 21. November 2025
AH-A 217/18
(Herrengarten)

Organisation:
Dr. Duygu Karatas

We kindly ask you to register using the following form: Registration


In today’s multi-media ecosystem, political actors and groups have used platforms such as Twitter to present themselves as the “voice of the people,” fostering desired political opinions and social interactions, and problematising them as legitimate or illegitimate. Social media affordances allow opinions to be expressed and rendered quantifiable, comparable, and accountable through counters and rankings. However, these same affordances are also mobilised to fabricate sociality, popularity, and representation—through coordinated or self-organised practices involving automation, bots, and trolls.
It is undeniable that social media offer affordances to express opinions and render them quantifiable, comparable, and accountable through counters and rankings. On the other hand, these affordances are also extended to fabricate sociality, popularity, and representation through coordinated or self-organised fabricating practices, using automation, bots, and trolls. In the global context that “popularity—measured through likes, retweets, and reactions—becomes the sole currency of political legitimacy” (Werber 2025, p. II), we problematise claims to popularity and representation. Recent developments in AI-generated content and AI techniques—such as large language models, chatbots, and synthetic media—have further expanded these possibilities, enabling new ways of fabricating visibility, narratives, and engagement. These tools not only accelerate the spread of political narratives but also reshape how international audiences encounter and interact with political issues originating in non-Western contexts. By leveraging cross-platform social media data, the workshop will also explore how such content circulates beyond national boundaries and how international publics interpret, adapt, or contest these narratives.
Focusing on Turkey as a non-Western setting, the workshop will discuss investigate popularising and depopularising practices in relation to the current specific social and political developments, conceptualising them as a social dimension of fabrication. While the desired people, issues, and opinions are deliberately popularised through these diverse popularising practices, undesirable dissident people, issues, and opinions are depopularised through both technological and legal means, such as court proceedings, arrests, blocking accounts, and the shutdown of some platforms. The workshop will be based on case studies on current political issues (from the arrest of the prominent journalist Fatih Fatih Altaylı to the corruption operation to Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, the presidential candidate of the opposition party CHP). It will try to explore and compare different fabrication practices and instruments, the roles of different actors from political parties to platforms, and their effects on the public and democracy.
Throughout the workshop, a balance is maintained between scholarly analysis and practical insight. By combining keynote theories, case studies, global comparisons, and hands-on media exercises, the agenda ensures that participants not only discuss how political issues are popularised or depopularised in Turkish social media but also actively engage with the socio-technical tools and global frames that shape these processes. This holistic design – rooted in sub-project C01’s themes of representation, AI, and popular engagement and collabored with Working Group “Global Dimension of the Popular” – creates an enriching experience with tangible scholarly outputs.

Objectives

  1. Examine popularisation and depopularisation as fabrication in Turkish political social media, focusing on how people, opinions, and issues gain or lose visibility.
  2. Analyse fabrication tactics—bots, trolling, coordinated campaigns, deepfakes, AI-generated content, and algorithmic curation—as tools for shaping “the popular.”
  3. Situate social media within a wider media ecology, tracing its interplay with political and cultural currents in Türkiye.
  4. Compare Turkish cases with global practices to highlight shared patterns and local specificities, fostering cross-context discussion.

Please see the detailed program below. The workshop language will be English. In the analysis of Turkish content, the translations will be provided, and the organisers will support the participants.

Programm

20.11.25

12:30 – 13:00

Regis­tra­tion & Welcome Coffee

20.11.25

13:00 – 13:15

Opening & Welcome Remarks

20.11.25

13:15 – 13:30

Light­ning Intro­duc­ti­ons

20.11.25

13:30 – 14:45

Keynote

Berk Esen
(Istan­bul)

Media and Poli­tics in Contem­po­rary Turkey: Autho­ri­ta­ri­a­nism in the Digi­tal Age – Depo­pu­la­ri­sing, Popu­lism, and the İmamoğlu Case

20.11.25

14:45 – 15:00

Coffee Break

20.11.25

15:00 – 16:00

Sarphan Uzuno­glu
(Izmir)

Ever­yone Beco­mes a Troll: How Label Infla­tion Obscu­res Orga­ni­zed Influ­ence Campaigns in Turkey

20.11.25

16:00 – 17:30

Discus­sion & Inter­ac­tive Lab: Popu­lism and Global Dimen­si­ons of (De)Popu­la­ri­sa­tion

21.11.25

10:00 – 10:30

Day 1 Recap & Plan for the Day

21.11.25

10:30 – 11:30

Koray Kaplica
(Doğru­luk Payı)

Fabri­ca­ted Publics: How Fact-Checking Confronts Poli­ti­cal Conspi­racy and the Making of “the People”

21.11.25

11:30 – 11:45

Coffee Break

21.11.25

11:45 – 12:30

Acti­vi­ties / Inter­ac­tive Discus­sion

21.11.25

12:30 – 14:00

Lunch

21.11.25

14:00 – 15:00

Banu Tuna
(Jour­na­lists’ Union of Turkey)

The Shut­down of Small News Outlets and the Role of Algo­rithms in the Survi­val of Oppo­si­tion Digi­tal Media in Turkey

21.11.25

15:00 – 15:30

Coffee Break

21.11.25

15:30 – 16:30

Acti­vi­ties / Discus­sion

21.11.25

16:30 – 17:00

Closing & Next Steps

Abstracts

Berk Esen

Media and Politics in Contemporary Turkey: Authoritarianism in the Digital Age – Depopularising, Populism, and the İmamoğlu Case

Since its rise to power in 2002, Turkey’s ruling Justice and Develop­ment Party (AKP) has systema­tically eroded demo­cratic institutions and consoli­dated control over the judiciary, media, and bureau­cracy, tilting the political playing field against the oppo­sition. The 2017 constitu­tional referendum formalized this process by replacing the parlia­mentary system with a hyper-presidential regime, weakening horizontal accoun­tability and concen­trating power in President Erdoğan’s hands. The recent arrest of İmamoğlu marks a clear move toward hege­monic authori­tarianism as seen in Venezuela, Belarus, and Russia, where elections no longer offer a chance for change. Taking stock of these develop­ments, this talk examines how the media land­scape has been restruc­tured under AKP rule. Once an important power-broker in Turkish politics, the main­stream media has been absorbed into a dense network of pro-govern­ment outlets that amplify official narra­tives and marginalize dissenting voices. Consequently, Turkey’s media sphere has become sharply polarized between government-aligned and pro-opposition venues, with the latter facing severe legal and financial pressures. While digital venues were initially seen as pluralistic, the govern­ment’s efforts to regulate and prosecute online content reveal how authori­tarian regimes adapt to the digital age by popu­larizing and depopu­larizing political issues in a partisan way.

Sarphan Uzunoglu

Everyone Becomes a Troll: How Label Inflation Obscures Organized Influence Campaigns in Turkey

Prof. Uzunoglu will discuss how Turkish political journalism frequently conflates the concepts of trolling and astro­turfing, two distinct forms of digital mani­pulation that carry very different democratic implica­tions. Drawing on a content analysis of 200 news and opinion articles published between 2023 and 2025, the study reveals a pervasive pattern of “label inflation,” where the term “troll” is used indiscri­minately to describe every­thing from individual harass­ment to highly coordinated propa­ganda campaigns. This lack of conceptual precision obscures the role of organized sponsor­ship and financial backing, leaving audiences unable to distinguish between spontaneous online provo­cation and covert influence opera­tions designed to simulate grass­roots support. While media coverage over­whelmingly condemns these practices as harmful to demo­cracy, it rarely offers concrete solutions or policy recommen­dations, instead stopping at moral outrage. Journalism must adopt a clearer voca­bulary and more rigorous investi­gative standards—such as uncovering sponsor­ship structures and recog­nizing hybrid influence campaigns—if it is to strengthen demo­cratic accountability and resilience in the face of increasingly sophisti­cated digital mani­pulation.

Koray Kaplıca

Fabricated Publics: How Fact-Checking Confronts Political Conspiracy and the Making of “the People”

In Türkiye’s digital politics, misinformation and conspiracy theories do more than distort facts—they fabricate publics. Drawing on over a decade of fact-checking experience at Doğruluk Payı, this talk examines the recurring narra­tives that have shaped how truth, trust, and belonging are negotiated online. By tracing the trajectory of political misinfor­mation in Türkiye over the past decade—culminating in a period marked by accele­rating demo­cratic back­sliding—it highlights how disinfor­mation operates as a social and political techno­logy that both reflects and reinforces the changing dynamics of power and legitimacy.